The Sacerdotal Clowns
The Sacerdotal Clowns
Â
Surrealism is too massive a topic for a blogh entry, but I would like to mention three American poets whose work I’ve always loved and who are in one way or another surrealists. Surrealism is more than an aesthetic movement, it is an entire orientation towards reality and art, and is one of the prime circulatory systems of the American body electric. Unlike its sibling Dada, surrealism is an expressive, mimetic, figurative art which abolishes the line between ‘rationality’ and ‘irrationality’ simply because it doesn’t exist. Surrealism is not the unique possession of anarchists and communists, though it accommodates them as easily as anyone else. Surrealism doesn’t judge its symbols, it trawls the unconscious and the outerworld indifferently in search of energetic, organic symbols and objects, to embody the dream and etherealize the body. Surrealism is a logic and to swim its currents is to move between the known and unknown by feel. It is intensely visual and in poetry lends itself to auditory eloquence without formalism. It rejects abstraction in the deductive, rational sense. It is not a science of signs and symbols. Its procedure is alchemical from beginning to end. It accommodates multifarious forms of gnosis. It seizes the razor’s edge with the inner eye, the wire in the blood and the poison in the machine, the radical organic forms of iterative and reiterative creation and destruction, the synthesis of barnacle and matheme.
Â
I want to start with the obscure: Mary Low. A poet friend and librarian, Peter McDonald, gave me Mary Low’s Where the Wolf Sings many years ago and I have been reading it ever since. It is short, published by Black Swan Press, and includes her collages as well as an Afterword by Franklin Rosemont, a surreal name. Mary Low, who died in 2007, was born in 1913 to Australian parents living in England. She has a marvelous, cosmopolitan biography. She was an anarchist, a classicist, an artist and a poet.
Â
Encounter
Â
Since first we met
I have known
the intimate joy of scissors,
sleek cats and nutmeg,
the tears of blind music at night,
and the whisper of fire among cinders.
Â
Since first we met
all stairs and flowers
grow spurs for me;
and palm-trees whip me with their hair
in sundry mirrors.
The small hours open their wounds for me
to the sound of flutes
that shake my heart.
Â
Since first we met
I feel like omega:
full of warm silk,
endless and groundless.
Â
Tulips Standing in Line
Â
Perishable crowns;
hierarchic emblems in a theory of from Byzance,
or fresh, selected scepters
for the Knave of Spades;
a scale of muted bells
rung in a garden closed with walls;
cups for the wine of contemplation
poured upon thorns;
an elegant, a leisurely parade
sustained by ancient certitudes:
beauty of blood in the morning—
slow, prideful discipline—
Â
and, later, the repose of folded hands
obedient to the dark.
Â
The Summer Visitors
Â
Do they still read poems under the big trees?
They used to come slowly,
in summer, in white dresses,
trailing a kaleidoscope of parasols.
Â
When they strolled smiling over the lawn
their slender snake-feet
left little trails of silver
along the hushed grass.
Â
They laughed so gently!
The summer breeze, like a harp,
caught up the falling sound
and made a slight bouquet of trills
follow them sweetly.
Â
Their forgotten faces were mild under straw hats.
They had hair like braided cascades,
and downward-glancing eyes,
slow and black and cool as ripe olives.
Â
When they read poems under the big tree,
they sat on a maze of cushions,
and their soft pink mouths
released a flood of petals on the air.
Â
It was a long time ago.
Do they still come?
Â
After reading these poems and a little about Mary Low it is natural to think of Mina Loy, another woman who lived to be quite old and didn’t give a damn about convention. I haven’t read any dissertations about her so I’m not sure if she’s considered to be a surrealist or not, but the Lunar Baedeker is a great work of surrealist poetry, and Insel, a modernist prose work, is on my long list of things to read one of these days. She was friends with everybody and had a long life. Rexroth, in a note included in my edition of the Lunar Baedeker, compares her to Marianne Moore, and finds Moore wanting, due to her apparent sexlessness. In the course of this now unacceptable comparison he pens these immortal sentences which leave me breathless: “She writes of the eternal platitude: the presence or absence of sexual satisfaction; and of the results: recreation marriage, procreation; sterility, disorder, disaster, death. Miss Moore is deliberately ‘inaccessible to the more immediate experiencer.’ As one reads of Mina Loy’s babies, one’s sphincters loosen. Her copulators stay copulated. Miss Moore of course, is interested in establishing public privilege for a special and peculiarly impoverished sensibility. One thing has never reared its ugly, funny, loveable little head in the garden of cast iron mignonettes which is her eminent domain. Mina Loy, in her best known work, dipped her pen in the glands of Bartholin, and wrote.â€
Â
I couldn’t disagree more with this but god bless and blast him, I have always loved Kenneth Rexroth for a reason.
Â
Apology Of Genius
Â
Ostracized as we are with God—
         The watchers of the civilized wastes
         reverse their signals on our track
        Â
         Lepers of the moon
         all magically diseased
         we come among you
         innocent
         of our luminous sores
Â
         unknowing
         how perturbing lights
         our spirit
         on the passion of Man
         until you turn on us your smooth fools’ faces
         like buttocks bared in aboriginal mockeries
Â
         We are the sacerdotal clowns
         who feed upon the wind and stars
         and pulverous pastures of poverty
Â
         Our wills are formed
         by curious disciples
         beyond your laws
Â
         You may give birth to us
         or marry us
         the chances of your flesh
         are not our destiny
Â
         And we are unaware
         if you confuse
         such brief
         corrosion with possession
Â
         In the raw caverns of the Increate
         we forge the dusk of Chaos
         to that imperious jewelry of the Universe
         –the Beautiful
Â
         While to your eyes
         a delicate crop
         of criminal mystic immortelles
         stands to the censor’s scythe.
Â
Â
Finally there is Will Alexander, a poet I have been reading slowly, with unending delight, ever since Joel Kuszai gave me his 1995 book Asia Haiti. Alexander is an LA poet, an avowed surrealist (continuing the work of Aime Cesaire, Bob Kaufman, Philip Lamatia etc) and totally out of the academic mainstream. Sometime after first reading Asia Haiti I came across a review of the The Best American Poetry anthology in Willow Springs, a journal I was trying to publish in. I forget the year, or the name of the eminence gris who is the guiding light of Willow Springs, but in her sifting of the anthology’s contents she dismissed Alexander’s poem as an oddity not worth commenting on. I was stunned, since he was the only poet in the entire thing that interested me. While Googling about for this blogh entry I discovered that as of 2007 Alexander was ill with kidney cancer and no insurance. I can find no further information on his health. Kidney cancer is normally a grim diagnosis. I hope with every particle of my poetic heart that he and his loved ones are well. His poetry is far too long to do more than quote here and there. Anyone who has read this far and doesn’t know about Will Alexander’s work I implore, “Read him!â€
Â
we
the cataclysmic
the hunchbacked harmonia in fragments
as though we could forage for selvas or ponies
through a tense immigration of storms and chastisements
Â
here we are linked
to skilled and unreasoning petrifaction as dice
as pylons of thirst
as haunted frankincense & chasms
devoid of atomics
of levitational timings
to invoke subterfuge
kinesis
creating attested flanks in the moon & its bastions
Â
in this untamed refuge
we are argument for the object as fecund subtractive
as folly by ‘inherent existence’
Â
summoned from high arroyos & arches
our eyes flow with the fervour of retreating neutrinos
of buried divinings
of suspensions in orbit
it is we who burn as a watch clock
as lifeless angel-worm annealments
brought to deeper post-mortem galvanics
to a fever which strengthens against opaque & landless
increments and patterns
Â
we who sought our living in ceaselessness
in explosive argon deliverance
as if our storms were mirrored in smoking phosphorous caves
as benign abnegation
as sigils by protective armasa invasion
Â
so the skull is useless
as sundered omnivorous cathedral
as ironic surge of transmuted voltage
Â
Â
Â
Â
Great trio of poets!
Aren’t they though? Thanks for reading.
Lovely and i formatjve read, just discovering Mary Low now
Isn’t she wonderful?Thanks for reading.
Jon